đâđš Ithaka, le nouveau film pour la libĂ©ration de Julian Assange
Julian Assange est le bouc Ă©missaire, le Victor Jara Ă qui il faut briser les mains pour donner lâexemple, une nouvelle version de PromĂ©thĂ©e comme le souligne son pĂšre, John Shipton.
đâđš Ithaka, le nouveau film pour la libĂ©ration de Julian Assange
Par Olivier Azam, le 14 janvier 2024 - English version below
Câest une sortie CinĂ©Mutins, un nouveau documentaire important quâon nous a confiĂ© pour la France : Ithaka, le combat pour la libĂ©ration dâAssange de Ben Lawrence. Ce film, tout rĂ©cent, reprend le fil du calvaire de Julian Assange lĂ oĂč lâavait laissĂ© Hacking Justice de Clara Lopez-Rubio et Juan Pancorbo, que nous avions sorti en 2021. Ce nouveau documentaire est moins axĂ© sur la procĂ©dure juridique qui arrive un peu au bout de tous les recours et se concentre sur le combat du pĂšre de Julian Assange (John Shipton) et de son Ă©pouse (Stella Assange), un combat quotidien pour le tenir en vie, parcourir le monde Ă la recherche de soutiens pour essayer dâĂ©largir encore le cercle.
Le film de Ben Lawrence est trĂšs Ă©mouvant. Au-delĂ mĂȘme de cette terrible injustice que vivent Julian Assange et sa famille, ses enfants qui grandissent sans leur pĂšre, les Ă©preuves quotidienne pour Stella et John qui courent un marathon Ă©puisant et parfois dĂ©sespĂ©rant, pointe lâĂ©norme contradiction de notre dĂ©mocratie occidentale : Qui est le criminel dans cette affaire ? OĂč en est-on de notre soumission pour accepter un tel scandale sans broncher ? Qui peut se prĂ©tendre journaliste sans dĂ©fendre la cause dâAssange ?
Dâabord rĂ©fugiĂ© Ă lâambassade dâEquateur Ă Londres puis dans une prison haute sĂ©curitĂ© depuis quatre ans pour avoir publiĂ© la vĂ©ritĂ©, rien que la vĂ©ritĂ©, Julian Assange est le seul journaliste emprisonnĂ© pour ces rĂ©vĂ©lations admises comme Ă©tant vraies (ce nâest pas leur vĂ©ritĂ© qui a Ă©tĂ© contestĂ©e, mais le fait dâinformer les citoyens des horreurs faites en leur nom et en secret). Julian Assange est le bouc Ă©missaire, le Victor Jara Ă qui il faut briser les mains pour donner lâexemple, une nouvelle version de PromĂ©thĂ©e comme le souligne son pĂšre. Julian Assange survit dans des conditions indignes pour tout humain, quoi quâil ait dâailleurs fait. Lâinjustice est ici flagrante et nous renvoie un terrible miroir de nos dĂ©mocraties occidentales aux fondations tellement fragiles. AprĂšs avoir vu ce film, impossible de rester de marbre. Comment supporter une telle injustice ? Mais avant tout, on comprend ici comment fonctionne le pouvoir et la nĂ©cessitĂ© absolue de sâorganiser collectivement.
La procĂ©dure interminable et la torture psychologique que subit Julian Assange dans sa cellule sont dĂ©jĂ une lourde peine, avant mĂȘme lâextradition (et un procĂšs aux Etats-Unis oĂč le journaliste transformĂ© en espion risque lâabsurde peine de 175 ans de prison), ne rĂ©side aujourdâhui que dans une vraie mobilisation comme on en a vu par le passĂ© pour quelquâun comme Nelson Mandela. Mais les temps ont changĂ©s, les hĂ©ros sont consommĂ©s et lâattention plus difficile Ă capter. Pourtant lâenjeu est Ă©norme. Lâaffaire Assange constitue un prĂ©cĂ©dent sur lâensemble de la libertĂ© de la presse en occident, et atteint peu Ă peu dâautres journalistes qui investiguent sur le pouvoir et les affaires, un rĂ©cent exemple Ă©tant lâaffaire Ariane Lavrilleux de Disclose interpellĂ©e par le DGSI en septembre dernier pour avoir fait son travail (en savoir plus)... Quand on comprend ce quâil se passe avec lâaffaire Assange, on comprend que tous les journalistes qui âportent la plume dans la plaieâ, tout simplement ceux qui osent encore enquĂȘter sur des affaires mettant en porte Ă faux les pouvoirs politiques, les intĂ©rĂȘts des milliardaires qui possĂšdent les grands mĂ©dias sont ou seront touchĂ©s. Mais ce glissement va bien au-delĂ dâun problĂšme de journalisme. Le dĂ©bat universitaire, la libertĂ© de crĂ©er dans lâart et la culture, dans lâĂ©ducation et lâenseignement, lâusage quâon fait dâInternet, quelles rĂšgles communes devons-nous adopter pour survivre Ă la rĂ©volution technologique qui a balayĂ© toutes nos certitudes dâantan...
... finalement lâensemble de la sociĂ©tĂ© est dĂ©jĂ trĂšs touchĂ© par des censures diverses, plus ou moins insidieuses et qui ne sont pas forcĂ©ment mĂ©diatisĂ©es, souvent mĂȘme totalement inconnues du public, au-delĂ des intĂ©ressĂ©s qui ne peuvent mĂȘme pas communiquer au risque dâaggraver encore la situation en sâauto-dĂ©signant comme des âmoutons noirsâ. Câest un cercle vicieux. Les consĂ©quences des censures dâune pensĂ©e rationnelle comme celle de Julian Assange et dâinformations solides comme celles de WikiLeaks, entrainent paradoxalement des âdĂ©lires complotistesâ [âpuisquâils sont capable dâagir comme ça contre la vĂ©ritĂ©, pourquoi ne pas douter de tout ?â]. Seuls les travaux documentĂ©s et sĂ©rieux nous permettent de tenir le cap et de pas abandonner la contestation Ă une critique inopĂ©rante car fracturĂ©e collectivement et parasitĂ©e par des thĂ©ories farfelues qui tiennent Ă distance des ralliements potentiels. Lâenjeu est de taille... Modestement, les livres et les films contribuent Ă entretenir des contre-feux, Ă pousser âla fragile barque de la raison humaine qui flotte, de façon incertaine sur un ocĂ©an de folieâ comme disait le mathĂ©maticien et philosophe, activiste pacifiste, Bertrand Russell.
Nous avons constatĂ© que le travail de fond de Stella Assange, John Shipton et leurs soutiens, peu Ă peu, agrĂšgent des cercles de plus en plus larges. En France, des politiques, journalistes, influenceurs, sont de plus en plus au courant de lâaffaire et certains sâengagent et la destruction organisĂ©e de lâimage dâAssange pendant des annĂ©es est peu Ă peu reconstruite Ă partir des faits. Câest un travail de fourmis, laborieux, parfois dĂ©sespĂ©rant, mais il faut sâatteler Ă dĂ©monter la propagande avec une grande exigence intellectuelle et beaucoup de rigueur. Il faut donc bien sâinformer soit-mĂȘme pour continuer Ă informer le plus grand nombre, calmement, avec des outils solides. Ithaka, le combat pour libĂ©rer Assangeest un nouvel outil qui vient complĂ©ter et mettre Ă jour les quelques autres. Depuis Hacking-Justice, on ne peut plus se plaindre quâil nâexiste pas assez de supports en Français pour ĂȘtre informĂ© de cette grande affaire de notre siĂšcle, il faut juste sâinterroger quand ils ne sont pas assez utilisĂ©s.
Olivier Azam, Les Mutins de Pangée.
Ithaka, the new film for the release of Julian Assange
By Olivier Azam, on January 14, 2024
It's a CinéMutins release, an important new documentary we've been entrusted with for France: Ben Lawrence's Ithaka, the fight to free Assange. This brand-new film picks up where Clara Lopez-Rubio and Juan Pancorbo's Hacking Justice, which we released in 2021, left off in Julian Assange's ordeal. This new documentary focuses less on the legal process, which has reached the end of its tether, and more on the struggle of Julian Assange's father (John Shipton) and his wife (Stella Assange) to keep him alive, travelling the world in search of support to try and widen the circle even further.
Ben Lawrence's film is very moving. Over and above the terrible injustice suffered by Julian Assange and his family, his children growing up without their father, the daily ordeals of Stella and John as they run an exhausting and sometimes despairing marathon, it points up the enormous contradiction in our Western democracy: who is the criminal in this affair? How submissive have we become to accept such a scandal without batting an eyelid? Who can claim to be a journalist without defending Assange's cause?
Taking refuge first in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, then in a high-security prison for the past four years for publishing the truth and nothing but the truth, Julian Assange is the only journalist imprisoned for his admittedly true revelations (it was not their truth that was contested, but the fact of informing citizens of the horrors that were being done in their name and in secret). Julian Assange is the scapegoat, the Victor Jara whose hands must be broken to set an example, a new version of Prometheus as his father points out. Julian Assange survives in conditions unworthy of any human, whatever he may have done. The injustice here is flagrant, and holds up a terrible mirror to our Western democracies, whose foundations are so fragile. After seeing this film, it's impossible to remain indifferent. How can you bear such injustice? Above all, we understand how power works, and the absolute necessity of collective organization.
The interminable proceedings and psychological torture suffered by Julian Assange in his cell are already a heavy penalty, even before extradition (and a trial in the USA where the journalist transformed into a spy faces the absurd sentence of 175 years in prison), and today lies only in a real mobilization like we've seen in the past for someone like Nelson Mandela. But times have changed, heroes are consumed and attention is harder to capture. Yet the stakes are enormous. The Assange affair sets a precedent for press freedom in the West as a whole, and is gradually reaching other journalists who investigate power and business, a recent example being the case of Ariane Lavrilleux of Disclose, questioned by the DGSI last September for doing her job (read more)... When we understand what's going on with the Assange affair, we understand that all journalists who âcarry the pen in the woundâ, quite simply those who still dare to investigate matters that challenge the political powers and the interests of the billionaires who own the major media, are or will be affected. But this shift goes far beyond a problem of journalism. Academic debate, the freedom to create in art and culture, in education and teaching, the use we make of the Internet, what common rules we need to adopt to survive the technological revolution that has swept away all our former certainties...
... in the end, the whole of society is already very much affected by various forms of censorship, more or less insidious, which are not necessarily publicized in the media, and are often even totally unknown to the public, beyond those concerned who can't even communicate, at the risk of making the situation even worse by designating themselves as âblack sheepâ. It's a vicious circle. The consequences of censoring rational thought like that of Julian Assange, and solid information like that of WikiLeaks, paradoxically lead to âconspiracy delusionsâ [âsince they're able to act like that against the truth, why shouldn't we doubt everything?â]. Only serious, well-documented work will enable us to stay the course, and not abandon our contestation to a critique that is inoperative because it is collectively fractured and parasitized by far-fetched theories that keep potential rallies at bay. The stakes are high... Modestly, books and films help to keep the fires burning, to push âthe fragile boat of human reason, which floats uncertainly on an ocean of madnessâ, as the mathematician, philosopher and pacifist activist Bertrand Russell put it.
We have seen that the ground-breaking work of Stella Assange, John Shipton and their supporters is gradually attracting wider and wider circles. In France, politicians, journalists and influencers are increasingly aware of the affair, and some are getting involved. The organized destruction of Assange's image over the years is gradually being reconstructed on the basis of the facts. It's a painstaking, laborious and sometimes desperate task, but it's one that requires a great deal of intellectual rigor and rigor to dismantle the propaganda. You need to be well-informed yourself if you are to continue to inform as many people as possible, calmly and with solid tools. Ithaka, the fight to free Assange is a new tool that complements and updates the others. Since Hacking-Justice, we can no longer complain that there aren't enough media in French to keep us informed about this major issue of our century, we just have to wonder when they aren't used enough.
Olivier Azam, Les Mutins de Pangée.